Meta Heads to US Court Over Alleged Harm to Children From Facebook, Instagram

Meta faces a US trial over allegations that Facebook and Instagram harmed children through addictive features and engagement-driven design.

Meta Heads to US Court Over Alleged Harm to Children From Facebook, Instagram

Meta Platforms is to appear before a US court this week on charges that Facebook and Instagram have harmed children by encouraging addictive behaviour and exposing young users to potential mental health risks.

The trial is among the first high-profile cases to arise from a wider set of lawsuits brought by families who claim that social media platforms were designed to maximise engagement from minors, even as the companies were aware of the potential psychological risks.

Also Read: TRAI Rolls Out 1601-Series for Utility, Logistics Service Calls to Curb Fraud

Allegations Over Platform Design:

Features like infinite scrolling and algorithm-based recommendations and notifications led to overuse among youngsters, plaintiffs say in court filings.

Long-term involvement was said to have a role to play in problems such as anxieties, depression, eating disorders and low self-esteem.

Meta has denied the allegations, which have always been disputed. The company has cited investments in safety features and parental controls designed to support younger users and families. Meta has also said there is no scientific consensus that its platforms directly cause mental health disorders.

Scrutiny Intensified After Haugen Revelations:

The case is part of a larger legal and regulatory battle over children’s safety on social media.

That scrutiny was ratcheted up in 2021 when former Facebook employe Frances Haugen leaked internal company documents showing that Meta’s own research had flagged the impact that Instagram was having on some teenage users, especially on body image.

The disclosures sparked congressional hearings, regulatory enquiries and renewed calls for stronger protections for minors online.

Meta has since rolled out a variety of youth safety measures, including enhanced parental oversight tools, tighter content controls for teens, default private settings for younger users, and limits on communication with unknown adults.

The company has also said that parents, app stores, schools and regulators have important roles to play in protecting children online.

Also Read: Spotify Tests ‘Skip Ahead’ Feature for Podcasts, Raising Questions Over Ad Exposure

Trial to Examine Internal Decisions:

The forthcoming proceedings will probably look at internal company communications, research findings and product design decisions made over a number of years.

Plaintiffs are seeking damages and are trying to prove that Meta knowingly put user engagement ahead of the well-being of children.

The case comes as governments and regulators around the world are increasing scrutiny of social media platforms. A number of US states have introduced legislation targeting social media use by minors, while regulators in Europe, Australia and other markets are considering issues including platform algorithms, age verification and online safety.